top of page

call for input | Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

Call for input: Human Rights in the Administration of Justice  Report of the Secretary General

Call for input: Human Rights in the Administration of Justice – Neurotechnology and other emerging technologies - Report of the Secretary General

Issued by

OHCHR

Deadline

09 March 2026

Purpose: To inform the Secretary General’s Report to the General Assembly, pursuant to resolution A/RES/79/172

Background

In resolution 79/172 the General Assembly requested “the Secretary-General to submit to the General Assembly at its eighty-first session a report on the latest developments, challenges and good practices in human rights in the administration of justice, including, inter alia, on the latest developments, risks and required safeguards regarding the potential use of neurotechnology and other emerging technologies in the administration of justice, and on the activities undertaken by the United Nations system as a whole...”

Key questions and types of input/comments sought

Guiding questions on the inputs sought

 

The following questionnaire aims to assist Member States and other relevant actors in providing information and inputs for the above-mentioned report.

• Please provide information on the latest developments and application of neurotechnology[3.1] and other emerging technologies in the administration of justice, in both civil and criminal matters. This includes invasive and non-invasive neurotechnologies being developed or used in the administration of justice, in civil and criminal matters.
• Please indicate what regulatory framework is used in the development and application of neurotechnology and other emerging technologies in the administration of justice in civil and criminal matters. In so doing, please indicate whether the existing regulatory framework has been amended to accommodate the use of neurotechnology and other emerging technologies or whether specific regulation has been adopted for this purpose. 
• Please indicate how the protection of and processing of neural data[3.2] and biometric data[3.3] that indirectly informs about neural activity is legally guaranteed and enforced in the administration of justice in civil and criminal matters. 
• Please provide information on the human rights risks and required safeguards regarding the use of neurotechnology and other emerging technologies in the administration of justice in civil and criminal matters.
• Please provide information on the measures taken in the development and use of neurotechnology and other emerging technologies in the administration of justice in civil and criminal matters to ensure protection of human rights including, but not limited to, the rights to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion, freedom of opinion and expression, freedom from torture and ill-treatment, the rights to privacy, liberty and security, fair trial and due process guarantees, non-discrimination, gender equality and effective remedies. 
• Please indicate whether human rights impact assessments are undertaken prior to the design and implementation of neurotechnology and other emerging technologies used in the administration of justice, in civil and criminal matters whether regular monitoring and evaluation are undertaken at later stages, and whether such assessments are made public. 
• Please provide information on how neurotechnology and other emerging technologies negatively impact persons often in vulnerable situations in the administration of justice, in civil and criminal matters, such as persons deprived of their liberty, women, child and juveniles, persons with disabilities, migrants, minorities, indigenous peoples and people of African descent.
• Please provide information about whether specific measures have been taken to ensure accountability and access to remedies for violation of human rights resulting from the use of neurotechnology and other emerging technologies in the administration of justice in civil and criminal matters.
• Please provide information on any decisions taken by the judiciary relating to the use of neurotechnology and other emerging technologies in the administration of justice in civil and criminal matters.

How inputs will be used?

Unless requested otherwise, the information provided may be made available on the OHCHR website.

3.1. Neurotechnology refers currently to devices, systems and procedures – encompassing both hardware and software – that directly measure, access, monitor, analyze, predict or modulate the nervous system to understand, influence, restore or anticipate its structure, activity and function.” UNESCO, Draft Recommendation on the Ethics of Neurotechnology, para. 2.

3.2. “Neural data include qualitative and quantitative data about the structure, activity and function of the nervous system gathered through neurotechnology...” See UNESCO, Draft Recommendation on the Ethics of Neurotechnology, para. 5

3.3. “Such biometric data are referred to as indirect neural data and non-neural data allowing mental states inferences in this Recommendation.” UNESCO, Draft Recommendation on the Ethics of Neurotechnology, para. 6

Next Steps

Input/comments may be sent by e-mail/fax/postal mail. They must be received by 9 March 2026 .

Submissions beyond the page limit and those received after the deadline may not be included in the report.

Email address: registry@ohchr.org

Email subject line: Administration of Justice .- Neurotechnology

Word/Page limit:
4000 words / 8 pages

Accepted file formats:
Word, PDF

Accepted Languages:
English, French, Spanish

Postal addresses:
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, United Nations Office at Geneva, CH 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland

Fax:
+41 22 917 90 08

nonprofit-badge-200.png
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

© copyright 2026 The Allen Institute for Human Rights Inc.

The Allen Institute for Human Rights is a 501(C)(3) nonprofit registered in the US under EIN: 85-2531944

frank@aihrfoundation.org

+1 (508) 857-8334

bottom of page